Fear and pain are arguably attributes of both reality and fiction,
most popularly topics within the gothic which explores the more ominous realms
of literature. Pleasure can be argued as the feeling of excitement, of
unrestrained enjoyment which may at first seem an opposite to fear and pain
however in a genre that often blurs and transgresses boundaries, fear, pain and
pleasure bode a striking resemblance. It could be argued the gothic evokes fear
amongst its readers as it explores death, the liminal and the supernatural,
however this is often the source of pleasure as it provides an exhilarating
escape into an unknown world, a world without boundaries. Readers can perhaps
indulge in sordid behaviour and sexual deviancy vicariously through characters,
creating a pleasurable and fearful experience. Whilst fear may equate terror
which could be argued as tantalising and exhilarating, it could be argued pain
is perhaps a less recognised source of pleasure. However, through sadomasochism
explored in the Bloody Chamber and forms of torture many characters gain
pleasure from either their own or others pain. In a sinister way, the gothic
perhaps explores the sadistic pleasure gained from inflicting pain. In the
natural world, predators often gain pleasure from toying with their prey,
similarly in the gothic, gothic villains relish in the pain of their victims. It
could be argued whilst physical pain may be a source of pleasure, emotional
pain rarely provides any form of pleasure for those who experience it perhaps
suggesting on a more literal level, fear and pain can be exciting and
pleasurable whilst hidden forms of emotional pain are far from any source of
pleasure.
Carter’s Bloody Chamber could be argued to be preoccupied and
fascinated by fear and pain as a source of pleasure, with obvious parallels to
the Marquis de Sade, pornographic images and violent language it seems to
highlight that “there is a striking resemblance between the act of love and the
ministrations of a torturer”. Carter explores sadomasochism through her
archetypal characters of the virginal woman “I was seventeen and knew nothing
of the world” and the dominant aristocratic male “he was rich as Croesus”. The
sexual experience is arguably one of pain for the woman and pleasure for the
dominant male as the violent verbs used highlight the physical pain she endures
“a dozen husbands impaled a dozen brides” at the expense of his pleasure
“shriek and blaspheme at the orgasm”. This could suggest the arguably sadistic
Marquis gains pleasure from the pain and impalement of his bride, perhaps
reinforcing that pain is not necessarily a source of pleasure for those who
experience it but for those who inflict it. It could be argued the use of “a
dozen brides” could suggest this is a universal experience and one of
commonality for females in a patriarchal society, whilst the sadomasochism
explored in the Bloody Chamber adds to the gothic genre and exhibits a taboo
subject it also provides a profound feminist message that women’s pain, whether
by rape or by oppression is a source of pleasure for men.
Within the Erl-King, pain and pleasure could be argued to be linked as
the narrator suggests “he devastates and consoles me”, the Erl-King perhaps
provides both pain or “grevious harm” and pleasure or comfort. He is a
character who inflicts pain and pleasure “you sink your teeth into my throat
and make me scream”. It could be argued Carter uses an innuendo here to perhaps
highlight that pain is a source of sexual pleasure for females, in contrast to
the Bloody Chamber in which sex seems purely pleasurable for the male, perhaps
pain is a source of pleasure for those upon whom it is inflicted. It could be
argued pleasure is in fact a source of fear, as fear is evoked from the thought
of losing the pleasure and love the homodiegetic narrator feels for this
mythological forest goblin. She
states she is not afraid of him but “only, afraid of vertigo, of the vertigo
with which he seizes me. Afraid of falling down.” Which could suggest she is
afraid of being discarded, being replaced and falling from his esteem as his
lover. She experiences metaphorical vertigo perhaps due to being held so high
in his regard and the constant worry and fear of being let go and losing the
pleasure she gains from being in such a privileged position. It is perhaps
human nature to want to hold on to happiness and pleasure, similarly to
Browning’s Porphyria’s Lover, the narrator in an attempt to preserve this state
of pleasure and eradicate the fear of loss murders the Erl-King with his own
hair “I shall take two huge handfuls of his rustling hair…I shall strangle him
with them”. Perhaps with pleasure or enjoyment comes the fear of losing such as
in an unpredictable genre such as the gothic pleasure may be taken away at any
point.
Bronte’s Wuthering Heights set amongst a backdrop of the hostile
Yorkshire moors presents characters who’s pleasure is sought from other
characters misery and fear. Heathcliff experiences, in childhood, maltreatment
and a plethora of abuse from his adoptive family, which could be seen as a
catalyst for his later revenge and “violent” character. In a revenge plot
against his abusers it could be argued Heathcliff gains pleasure from the pain
and fear he inflicts upon his former abusers and the next generation of
characters. Heathcliff causes emotional pain for Hareton who is arguably
innocent “a cherub”, he is denied education and Heathcliff deliberately tries
to lower his status “Now my bonny lad you are mine! And we’ll see if one tree
won’t grow as crooked as another with the same wind to twist it”. The use of
“twist” suggests Heathcliff’s manipulation of Hareton’s status suggesting the
cruel nature of Heathcliff, whilst the enthusiasm in his tone highlighted
through the use of an exclamation mark could suggest Heathcliff gains pleasure
and relishes in the task of stunting Hareton’s development. However, whilst
Heathcliff unequivocally gains some form of pleasure from inflicting emotional
pain on Hareton who is later taunted by Cathy for being illiterate, it could be
argued despite Heathcliff inflicting physical pain upon Hindley “the ruffian
kicked and trampled on him and dashed his head repeatedly” he doesn’t perhaps
gain pleasure from this form of pain. This outburst of violence could be argued
as just that, an outburst in retaliation to years of scornful abuse, rather
than a deliberate attempt to hurt Hindley for his own pleasure as rather than
murder Hindley in this opportune moment, Heathcliff leaves him to recover. It
could be argued pain as a source of pleasure connotes a sadistic enjoyment,
which is perhaps not suitable for this situation as Heathcliff may gain
momentary enjoyment from inflicting pain he does not bask in it, it is perhaps
not a source of pleasure but somewhat justified satisfaction.
Whilst many gothic texts provide evidence of pain as a source of
pleasure it could be argued emotional pain in Wuthering Heights is completely
devoid of pleasure. Emotional pain could be seen as a source of distress
and insanity, such as Heathcliff experiences emotional pain when Catherine dies
“would you like to live with your soul in the grave” “howled like a savage
beast” this pain is not a source of pleasure in the slightest but rather causes
extreme behaviour, extreme distress and Heathcliff to digress to animalistic tendencies.
It could be argued Catherine experiences emotional pain when she is torn
between two lovers “my love for Linton is like the foliage in the woods; time
will change it…my love for Heathcliff is like the eternal rocks beneath”. This
dilemma is a source of emotional pain yet does not entail pleasure for
Catherine nor Heathcliff and Edgar, suggesting whilst physical pain may be a
source of pleasure as in the Bloody Chamber, emotional pain is a source of the
opposite of pleasure –misery. In gothic writing, pleasure gained may be reliant
upon the type of pain inflicted as emotional or psychological pain may not be a
source of pleasure despite there being a somewhat fine line between physical
pain in sadomasochistic practices or linked with sexuality and pleasure.
It could be argued fear is perhaps a
driving force for action in Macbeth rather than a source of pleasure. Macbeth
could be disputed as a play which exhibits very little pleasure at all as it is
arguably preoccupied with the devastating consequences of murder and parasitic
guilt. Macbeth could be seen as a highly impressionable character, propelled
into regicide by Lady Macbeth who could be seen as persuasive “pour my spirits
in thine ear” and the Witches equivocations. It could be argued Macbeth is
fearful of being seen as “ a coward in thine own esteem” and fearful of the
supernatural powers of the Witches, this fear could be argued as not a source
of pleasure but rather a catalyst for the rising murder count as the play
progresses. Macbeth is arguably also fearful of being overthrown “to be thus is
nothing, but to be safely thus” which causes him much paranoia and to arrange
Banquo’s murder, suggesting fear within Macbeth is a source of insecurity and
perhaps pleasure can only be gained once the fear has been eradicated “Who wear our health but sickly in his life, which in his death were
perfect”. It could be argued Shakespeare portrays pleasure as living without
guilt or threat suggesting that as guilt and threat, two key components of the
gothic, could be argued as linked with fear, fear can perhaps not be a source
of pleasure.
Lady Macbeth could be argued as a fearful character as she rejects
expected roles of the female as a mother “take my milk for gall” and has
powerful manipulative qualities “look like th’innocent flower, but be the
serpent under’t”. For original Jacobean audiences, who were primarily
Christian, Shakespeare’s portrayal of Lady Macbeth could be argued as a source
of fear as she poses a threat to the normal values and expectations of women.
Jacobean society would have been predominantly patriarchal and such an
empowered and dominant female character may have been seen as disconcerting as
she may have tempted female audience members to adopt a stronger stance or
perhaps as Shakespeare proposed a woman who was perhaps unnatural or lacking in
“the milk o’ human kindness”. Whilst writing with gothic elements portrays fear
from characters it could be argued it is a genre uniquely able to conjure fear
from its audiences, as it explores the unnatural, supernatural and taboos. This
form of fear from audiences at the unexpected and unpredictable Lady Macbeth
could be argued as not a source of pleasure but source of worry for Jacobean
audiences as she poses a threat to the idea of a woman.
Gothic literature is perhaps not the only genre to explore fear and
pain but perhaps the only one in which these are core to its writing. Many
gothic features such as murder, subterranean passages, rape and power all hold
elements of both fear and pain suggesting they are integral to gothic writing.
The fear experienced by gothic audiences may be a source of exhilarating thrill
or perhaps of worry and anger but nevertheless provocative. Pain may be a
source of pleasure for both the administrator and the recipient especially when
it is linked with sexuality or sadomasochism, however emotional pain may be a
form of pain from which no pleasure can be drawn. The gothic highlights the
fine line between pleasure, fear and pain which may have been seen as a
distinct dichotomy before the exploratory and subversive genre of the gothic.
No comments:
Post a Comment