Tuesday 17 June 2014

Beginnings and Endings

Beginning
The beginning of Wuthering Heights establishes not only a framed narrative but a conventionally civilised narrator who closely links with the reader as an outsider venturing into this unknown, gothic world. The beginning also establishes a very clear time frame “1801” which is particularly significant as the novel progresses, not only to destabilise the reader as the novel encompasses flashbacks and a non-linear chronology but also determines by the end of the novel the point at which Catherine becomes a “waif” highlighting her decision is a pivotal point in the novel that haunts her beyond the grave since they day she made it. The “waif” says it has been such for “twenty years”, however since Catherine’s death it has only been 17, Nelly’s narrative gap of three years is also significant as readers come to realise Catherine has been a “waif” since the day she chose to marry Edgar and not her soul mate “I am Heathcliff”.
 The beginning of Wuthering Heights also encompasses one of the most violent, gothic and disturbing projections in the entire novel perhaps establishing the novel as one in which boundaries are destabilised. Lockwood’s initial characterisation as the a civilised, gentile man is destabilised in his gruesome act of violence against the ghostly Catherine “rubbed to and fro across the broken pane till the blood ran down and soaked the bed clothes”, not only does this provide surface shock value, true to gothic form, but it sets up an unsettling debate of whether the wild is within the domestic and if oppositions within the gothic are as established and fixed as thought, perhaps the gothic and Wuthering Heights alike seek to challenge our “convenient yet repressive thought patterns.” Hogle.
The beginning is particularly confusing both for Lockwood and the reader perhaps in a ploy to both entice and destabilise the reader in the gothic world. For example, Lockwood confuses dead rabbits for cats, Cathy for Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff as a “capital fellow”. Readers are unsure of the relationships and dynamics of Wuthering Heights, perhaps foreshadowing the constant state of confusion throughout the novel caused by excessive extremes.
Ending
The ending is perhaps one of the many oddities within the novel in the sense it seems out of place and a rather neat and tidy ending for a novel filled with such complexities. However, we must remember the ending is filtered through the novels perhaps most imperceptive character who has seldom managed to understand the dynamics of the characters. Lockwood’s description of a peaceful summers day with “butterflies” and breeze blowing through the grass may offer a sense of resolution, a far cry from the destructive tumultuous weather that has plagued the heights perhaps signifying destruction has come to an end, with the death of the first generation characters and the union of the second generation characters perhaps the heights will be peaceful at last. However, whilst we may see Hareton as breaking the cycle of violence it could be argued his striking resemblance to Catherine could make him susceptible to being an explosive force also “for the space of half a year the gunpowder lay as harmless as sand”, there is no guarantee the quiet hush that presides at present is fixed, as the novel has frequently expressed boundaries are often breached, oppositions often destabilised and calm often ravaged by storm. It could also be argued this beautiful description is mislead as he suggests the difficulty in imagining “unquiet slumbers”, yet he himself has experienced the ghostly presence of Catherine, similarly the phrase “sleepers” perhaps suggests a lack of finality and a sense of temporary rest, perhaps they are merely sleeping and will wander the moors as they awaken.
The ending could suggest a sense of resolution as notions of a ghostly Catherine are in contrast to those of ones in the beginning, for example in the beginning she is a child perhaps trapped in an infantile state due to her destructive decision to marry Edgar which have caused her to become a “waif” or perhaps due to a want to accommodate both loves and a reluctance to choose to avoid limitation. However, in the ending of the novel a young boy states he has seen a woman and a man roaming the moors, the use of “woman” is significant as it suggests Catherine’s ghost has now progressed from child to adult perhaps in the reconciliation of her and Heathcliff.
Beginning
The beginning of the play establishes the supernatural and the theme of violence. The opening scene depicts the witches who exist on the fringe of society, as a genre the gothic is argue to lie upon the fringe of the acceptable as it is on this borderland that fear resides, similarly the Witches occupy the fringes of society opening the play with three particularly terrifying characters perhaps establishing the gothic element of the play and eliciting curiosity from audiences, who in Jacobean times would have been enthralled by notions of witchcraft. The play simultaneously opens with tumultuous, stormy weather upon the dark heath perhaps also foreshadowing two core themes of Macbeth, destruction and concealment emphasised by the witches who are shrouded in obscurity, a key gothic concept.
The second opening scene of the play depicts a gruesome battle in which “noble Macbeth” “unseam’d him from the nave to the chaps”, the play incorporates both literal and metaphorical violence throughout and violence is a central theme to Macbeth that opens up debates of acceptable and patriotic violence within a battle context and heinous, sinful violence in the context of a domestic setting whilst similarly causing destruction by and to the main protagonists and peripheral characters. By opening the play with such violence, Shakespeare perhaps foreshadows the multitude of violent acts that follow suggesting that violence breeds violence or “unnatural deeds do breed unnatural troubles”.
Ending
The ending of Macbeth is arguably both a triumph and a loss, both Lady Macbeth described as a “fiend-like Queen” and Macbeth a “butcher” have died. Gothic heroes such as Macbeth, despite their crimes often continue to receive audience sympathy perhaps seeing the death of the protagonist as a loss. However, the ending moves “away from tyranny, back to grace” as Scotland is alleviated from tyrannical rule in which “to do harm is laudable” in a triumphant yet ironic twist of inescapable fate. Despite Macbeth’s conviction in his ability to escape fate based upon the witches equivocations, the ending projects an important message of not only the detrimental impact of violence and ambition but that fate or rather destiny is determined. This could be highlighted by the opening reference to the Thane of Cawdor prior to Macbeth was murdered for treachery, similarly Macbeth has been murdered for tyranny and reached the same fate as others who have held that title, reinforcing the perhaps supernatural force of fate. However, whilst peace may be restored in Scotland after the death of the destructive and tyrannical protagonists, it could be argued the most insidious characters, the witches, are still at large. The witches could be argued to have instigated the events that have unfolded through their use of equivocations and thus likely to be a destructive force once again to anyone who is susceptible to their prophecies. The witches represent the marginalised, they are powerless women on the fringe of society, marginalised people are often the destructive forces in gothic novels suggesting the real evil forces within the play have not been eradicated by the end, providing no resolution.
Beginning
The title story of the collection establishes a myriad of tales in which, true to the connotations of their title, depict notions of motherhood, menstruation, fertility and sexual maturation alongside the symptom of death. The Bloody Chamber as a collection begins with a tale of fierce patriarchy, materialism and male sadism and female masochism. It could be argued as a gothic bildungsroman, as the young “innocent and confined” girls transitions between the liminal state of inexperience to a somewhat undesirable “unguessable country of marriage”. The beginning tale emphasises the gothic concepts of the liminal with the setting an “amphibious” place and boundary transgression, made explicit by the use of “country” to suggest borders between innocence and experience. However one of the main concepts running throughout the fabric of the tale is that of the male gaze and the notion of identity. The symbolic use of mirrors in this tale highlights the universality of male objectification, the young girl does not create her own sense of identity but merely sees herself in the mirror as her Marquis sees her, a piece of “horseflesh” and merely a sexual object. She sees a “multitude of girls” and a “dozen husbands impaled a dozen brides” perhaps suggesting this is a common experience for women, their identities are constructed through the male gaze. The beginning tale is perhaps the most luxuriant, decadent and frightening in its exemplification of patriarchy, albeit the Snow Child is perhaps a more graphic, explicit example of this, and can be seen as a mirror image of the last tale at the end of the collection in which mirrors and the liminal similarly play a part.
Ending
Wolf-alice ends the collection and could be seen as a contrasting tale to the Bloody Chamber, it similarly is set in a castle and encompasses concepts of motherhood and menstruation however, true to fairytale form, it offers a different moral message. In contrast to the beginning story in which the young girls identity is solely constructed by the male gaze, Wolf-Alice’s identity is formed on her own accord by herself. The young girl is not oppressed or even very much aware of the male in her castle, he “ceased to cast a reflection” on the mirror and thus ceases to be part of society. Like many women, due to his bestial, supernatural qualities he is marginalised. Carter perhaps depicts both the male and female in this tale as being equally marginalised in society, however in Alice forming her own identity she can bring the Duke into humanity and into society through compassion and acceptance “without disgust…without hesitation”. Whilst Carter perhaps takes a more radical approach in her first title story depicting extreme examples of polar opposite genders, one a tiger and one a lamb she perhaps suggests in order to overcome being prey the predator must be eradicated. However in Wolf-Alice a more equitable relationship is established built on compassion not inequalities in power in which neither male nor female, lamb nor tiger need to be eradicated for the other to survive, as she suggests in The Tigers Bride “his appetite need not be my extinction”. As the stories progress through the collection with an obvious feminist intent, they highlight the need for males and females to have both masculine or tigerish qualities and femininity or lambhood in a final condemnation of societies gender constructs and its ability to marginalise people. Carter throughout her tales poses the question “can a bird sing only the one it knows?” “can the bitten apple flesh out its scar again?” suggesting can we as a society change our perception and ideas of gender and women that have been deep seated and detrimental for so long.
Single Beginnings
Tigers Bride – setting, the idea of revenance , the cold Russian weather infecting the sweet sensual lethargy, Father’s gambling and objectification has travelled with them. Gothic setting “a place uniquely suited to public executions”
Endings
Tigers bride – “disintegrated” social constructs and gender constructs coming down, coming off with successive skin, layers of socialisation eradicated. Change from woman to beast, better than the alternative objectification, revert back to the natural world in which patriarchy and objectification does not exist, chooses to act rather than react like her mechanical doll
Erl King – similar to Porphyria’s Lover, uses his hair to strangle him, sets the caged birds caged women free and frees herself from her captor and grievous harm, in order to survive and escape entrapment she must kill him, there can only be one predator and one prey at a time

The werewolf – sinister ending, wolf in sheeps clothing, monosyllabic last line, orchestrates her own grandmothers lynching, distortion of family relationships

No comments:

Post a Comment